|
In your text on the 555 LED driver, you imply that the LED is a more efficient illuminator when pulsed.
I always assumed that the eye integrated fairly perfectly and that it will smooth (or average the brightness) and therefore no efficiency is gained by pulsing.
Do you know something that I do not? I ask seriously.
BTW as an opto engineer I found your website interesting.
Roy.
Thanks. You misunderstand the way the human eye works. It perceives short-duration bright pulses (faster than 25 per second) as continuously bright whereas a cat or bird allegedly doesn't see short duration pulses at all. This is why TV sets use a scan rate of 25 frames per second (later models and monitors use a higher speed to eliminate the "flickering-at-the-corner-of-the-eye" effect completely.
The reason it works is the fact that the human eye suffers from a "persistence-of-vision" effect, rather like the cathode ray tube used in radar systems. Once the optic rods in the retina are stimulated, they fire nerve pulses for a significant fraction of a second. Just imagine what happens when someone points a camera flash at you. The flash persists in your eye for much longer than the actual light duration. Now imagine a strobe light - it's bright. Now imagine a strobe light at 50 flashes per second; all you see is a continuously dazzling light.
I learned all this at school in my early 'teens, back in the 1960s. I despair of the "modern" educations sytem. What the heck do they teach?
Martin
|